LG's $3,500 16‑Inch Gram Pro Disappoints Critics

Unveiled for the 2026 model year and carrying a $3,500 tag, LG's newest 16‑inch Gram Pro laptop has attracted criticism from reviewers who argue that its performance and features fail to justify the steep price.

Positioned as ultra‑light, premium productivity devices, the Gram series is promoted by LG, with the Pro version presented as an upgrade for users who want a sizable display while staying portable. While the latest unit still offers the 16‑inch 3K screen and a sub‑2.5‑pound body, critics point out that its Intel Core i7 CPU, 16 GB RAM and 1 TB SSD match the specs of cheaper rivals that appeared earlier this year.

Analysts note that the notebook market is now highly saturated, with competitors delivering equal or superior specifications at reduced costs. For instance, Dell, HP and Lenovo each sell ultrabooks featuring 16‑inch high‑resolution displays, integrated graphics and similar battery endurance for less than $2,000. Against this backdrop, LG's pricing seems out of step with what shoppers expect in terms of value.

In addition to cost concerns, reviewers point out several functional drawbacks. The keyboard offers less travel than earlier Gram versions, and the trackpad fails to deliver the accuracy expected by power users. Moreover, the battery life—a traditional strong point for the Gram line—does not live up to the promised 15 hours in real‑world use, delivering roughly 10 hours during standard office tasks.

LG has yet to issue a comprehensive reply to the feedback, yet its track record of quick updates implies that upcoming versions may tackle the noted problems. Possible enhancements could involve offering a more powerful processor, refining the keyboard and trackpad, and introducing a pricing structure that better competes, particularly as LG aims to keep its foothold among mobile professionals.

The reaction to the Gram Pro highlights a wider industry shift: high price tags now depend on clear benefits in speed, durability, or ecosystem synergy. As consumers balance expense against functionality, makers that fail to substantiate a premium are likely to encounter pressure to cut prices or introduce unmistakable, differentiated features in future releases.